The Greek auction model for standalone batteries is continuing to raise concerns within the business community ahead of a forthcoming second auction.
Market skepticism is focused on the possibility of a recurrence of low bids at levels that would raise questions about the viability of projects and the very nature of the Greek model, which features aid for both longer-term capital expenditure and operating expenses.
The main debate, both in Greece and beyond, about the Greek auction model for standalone batteries is focused on this provision of investment and operational support for projects.
Critics of the Greek model contend that aid for operating expenses is not in line with free-market logic and inevitably leads to market distortion.
A key concern for the Greek auction model, given low bids submitted in the first auction, is whether projects can be viable under the current costs of storage and battery technology, its critics are pointing out.
Many market players have expressed preference for the Spanish model, whose aid is limited to capital expenditure and project revenues are generated purely through market participation, as a more appropriate model.
This offers projects incentive to fully integrate into the market and optimize their revenues, market players have noted.
As a result, projects would be developed faster and also have better viability rates, supporters of the Spanish model note.